復興航 : 撤銷合併 威航先停業1年
心跳多久愛多久
（中央社記者韋樞台北27日電）原本計劃今年10月1日完成與母公司復興航空合併案的廉價航空V Air威航，經威航董事會決議，撤銷合併案，並改為10月4日起停業1年，以處理相關事務。
復興航空發布重訊，子公司威航公司董事會決議，自今年10月4日起至106年10月3日止停業1年。原本威航於10月1日與母公司復興航空合併，則因考量公司未來營運發展規劃，撤銷合併案。
復興航空表示，為了有效減少虧損力求營運穩定，以及考量合併作業的相對繁複，因此更改原先合併的決議，成為威航停業1年，並利用這1年的時間妥善處理後續事宜。
復興航空指出，身為母公司，將確保威航一切程序恪遵勞動法規，並在法規基礎上確保員工權益。
日前威航公布合併案，並進行善後工作時，傳出威航資方未周知勞工溝通協調，即送大量解雇案予台北市政府，後經北市府要求威航必須與勞方充分溝通。
但威航認為外傳8月17日提出大量解雇為誤解，應是近期威航確實與北市勞動局溝通及討論計畫書呈報內容，而計畫書內容尚在調整中，並未正式送件，造成誤解。1050827
復興航空發布重訊，子公司威航公司董事會決議，自今年10月4日起至106年10月3日止停業1年。原本威航於10月1日與母公司復興航空合併，則因考量公司未來營運發展規劃，撤銷合併案。
復興航空表示，為了有效減少虧損力求營運穩定，以及考量合併作業的相對繁複，因此更改原先合併的決議，成為威航停業1年，並利用這1年的時間妥善處理後續事宜。
復興航空指出，身為母公司，將確保威航一切程序恪遵勞動法規，並在法規基礎上確保員工權益。
日前威航公布合併案，並進行善後工作時，傳出威航資方未周知勞工溝通協調，即送大量解雇案予台北市政府，後經北市府要求威航必須與勞方充分溝通。
但威航認為外傳8月17日提出大量解雇為誤解，應是近期威航確實與北市勞動局溝通及討論計畫書呈報內容，而計畫書內容尚在調整中，並未正式送件，造成誤解。1050827
回憶綿長
Further redundancies on the cards at V Air
威航已資遣近一成員工 人力調整月底定案
Earlier this month, TransAsia Airways’ executive board decided to merge with their subsidiary company, V Air.
V Air, which employs approximately 250 people, has already made a series of redundancies, with approximately 20 members of staff laid off in the short term. Management from TransAsia Airways and V Air are due to make a final decision on staffing levels before the end of the month.
V Air, which has been operating for less than two years, has made losses of nearly NT$1 billion. Following the announcement of a merger with TransAsia Airways, there has been a succession of voluntary resignations among its employees, who have chosen not to wait for the results of the redundancy process. V Air has announced it has already let go of approximately 20 pilots and cabin crew that have not yet started training, because their positions will not be needed in the future.
V Air has indicated that, following the merger, adjustments will be made to staffing levels and that not all V Air employees will be able to transfer to TransAsia Airways. The airline expects staffing requirements will be clear by the end of the month, after which time the company will enter into a consultation process with employees to discuss their futures with the company.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang/archives/2016/08/23/2003653652
威航已資遣近一成員工 人力調整月底定案
Earlier this month, TransAsia Airways’ executive board decided to merge with their subsidiary company, V Air.
V Air, which employs approximately 250 people, has already made a series of redundancies, with approximately 20 members of staff laid off in the short term. Management from TransAsia Airways and V Air are due to make a final decision on staffing levels before the end of the month.
V Air, which has been operating for less than two years, has made losses of nearly NT$1 billion. Following the announcement of a merger with TransAsia Airways, there has been a succession of voluntary resignations among its employees, who have chosen not to wait for the results of the redundancy process. V Air has announced it has already let go of approximately 20 pilots and cabin crew that have not yet started training, because their positions will not be needed in the future.
V Air has indicated that, following the merger, adjustments will be made to staffing levels and that not all V Air employees will be able to transfer to TransAsia Airways. The airline expects staffing requirements will be clear by the end of the month, after which time the company will enter into a consultation process with employees to discuss their futures with the company.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang/archives/2016/08/23/2003653652
大王叫我來巡山
不合併是否也表示不承接福岡的航線?因為復興本身沒福岡線啊!趕快給個交代吧，11月去不去得成心裡一直七上八下的。
非連續假日的放寬心, 復興還需要你們衝載客率...
雖然買威航的票價不高, 但總比空位好^^
非連續假日的放寬心, 復興還需要你們衝載客率...
雖然買威航的票價不高, 但總比空位好^^
發糞塗牆
停業一年，員工還不是要停職，沒薪水，我看有誰受的了，一年後搞不好就全離職了
無薪假一年，一來不用付遣散費，二來不會被勞工局罰錢，三來一年後如果航景繁榮可再營運不用再申請開公司，果然是經過高指點的決策。
無薪假一年，一來不用付遣散費，二來不會被勞工局罰錢，三來一年後如果航景繁榮可再營運不用再申請開公司，果然是經過高指點的決策。
孤街舊巷
wellcom V-air staffs & pilots posting ur comments here!
飲盡這壺明月光
會不會是先停運，然後等員工受不了自己離職，因為合併就必須安排員工在新公司的職位，等到差不多沒那麼多人了，復興再接受威航的飛機，又不會有抗議的聲音，多麼美好的銜接啊！
一針見血....
台灣企業都是喜歡這樣玩。
一針見血....
台灣企業都是喜歡這樣玩。
深知自己不討喜
一針見血....
台灣企業都是喜歡這樣玩。
that's why Taiwan "enjoys" poor air safety records since 1980...
transasia 's the worst in the worst, their GE235 flight
台灣企業都是喜歡這樣玩。
that's why Taiwan "enjoys" poor air safety records since 1980...
transasia 's the worst in the worst, their GE235 flight
你長了一張欠吻的嘴
By Siva Govindasamy | SINGAPORE
Taiwan regulators are likely to put more pressure on TransAsia Airways to review its maintenance and safety procedures after Wednesday's crash, its second fatal accident in seven months.
Industry data showed the crash of Flight GE235, in which at least 16 people were killed, was the fifth aircraft the airline has written off since 1995.
The death toll could still rise after the ATR 72-600, which had 58 passengers and crew on board, crashed into a river shortly after taking off from Taipei's Songshan airport.
This comes just seven months after a TransAsia ATR 72-500 crashed while trying to land at Penghu Island, killing 48 of the 58 passengers and crew on board.
There have been two other fatal accidents and another two major incidents in the airline's history, according to data from Flightglobal Ascend, an industry consultancy.
In December 2012, an ATR 72-200 freighter crashed en route to Macau from Taipei, killing both crew members. In 1995, an ATR 72-200 crashed into a hill near Songshan, killing all four crew.
In 2003, an Airbus A321 was written off after colliding with a vehicle that had strayed onto the runway while the plane was landing. A year later, an Airbus A320 was severely damaged when it over-ran the runway while landing at Songshan.
There were no fatalities in either of those incidents.
Investigators into the latest disaster are likely to focus on cockpit procedures and maintenance issues at the airline, said Greg Waldron, Asia Managing Editor at Flightglobal.
"Coming so soon after July’s crash, the airline could come under intense scrutiny by regulators, not to mention the impact this will have on public perceptions of the carrier,” he added.
Taiwan had a poor air safety record from the 1980s to the early 2000s due to several fatal crashes, mostly at flag carrier China Airlines.
Before last year's TransAsia incident, Taiwan's last fatal crash came in May 2002 when a China Airlines Boeing 747-200 broke up mid-air on the way to Hong Kong, killing all 225 people on board.
That prompted the Taiwan government, with help from agencies such as the International Air Transport Association (IATA), to revamp its regulatory agencies.
China Airlines also reviewed its procedures and passed IATA’s International Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) in 2005, which meant that it met global safety standards.
The focus now is on TransAsia, which was listed on the Taiwan stock exchange in November 2011 and remains a much smaller player than China Airlines and EVA Air.
The airline, which also has Airbus A320s and A330s, mainly operates services from Taiwan to other Northeast Asian destinations in China and Japan. It also has services to South Korea, Macau, Thailand and Cambodia.
Its ambitious management has, in the past, expressed hopes of eventually becoming a larger carrier with services to Europe or the United States using aircraft such as the Airbus A380.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-taiwan-airplane-transasia-idUSKBN0L80RK20150204
Taiwan regulators are likely to put more pressure on TransAsia Airways to review its maintenance and safety procedures after Wednesday's crash, its second fatal accident in seven months.
Industry data showed the crash of Flight GE235, in which at least 16 people were killed, was the fifth aircraft the airline has written off since 1995.
The death toll could still rise after the ATR 72-600, which had 58 passengers and crew on board, crashed into a river shortly after taking off from Taipei's Songshan airport.
This comes just seven months after a TransAsia ATR 72-500 crashed while trying to land at Penghu Island, killing 48 of the 58 passengers and crew on board.
There have been two other fatal accidents and another two major incidents in the airline's history, according to data from Flightglobal Ascend, an industry consultancy.
In December 2012, an ATR 72-200 freighter crashed en route to Macau from Taipei, killing both crew members. In 1995, an ATR 72-200 crashed into a hill near Songshan, killing all four crew.
In 2003, an Airbus A321 was written off after colliding with a vehicle that had strayed onto the runway while the plane was landing. A year later, an Airbus A320 was severely damaged when it over-ran the runway while landing at Songshan.
There were no fatalities in either of those incidents.
Investigators into the latest disaster are likely to focus on cockpit procedures and maintenance issues at the airline, said Greg Waldron, Asia Managing Editor at Flightglobal.
"Coming so soon after July’s crash, the airline could come under intense scrutiny by regulators, not to mention the impact this will have on public perceptions of the carrier,” he added.
Taiwan had a poor air safety record from the 1980s to the early 2000s due to several fatal crashes, mostly at flag carrier China Airlines.
Before last year's TransAsia incident, Taiwan's last fatal crash came in May 2002 when a China Airlines Boeing 747-200 broke up mid-air on the way to Hong Kong, killing all 225 people on board.
That prompted the Taiwan government, with help from agencies such as the International Air Transport Association (IATA), to revamp its regulatory agencies.
China Airlines also reviewed its procedures and passed IATA’s International Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) in 2005, which meant that it met global safety standards.
The focus now is on TransAsia, which was listed on the Taiwan stock exchange in November 2011 and remains a much smaller player than China Airlines and EVA Air.
The airline, which also has Airbus A320s and A330s, mainly operates services from Taiwan to other Northeast Asian destinations in China and Japan. It also has services to South Korea, Macau, Thailand and Cambodia.
Its ambitious management has, in the past, expressed hopes of eventually becoming a larger carrier with services to Europe or the United States using aircraft such as the Airbus A380.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-taiwan-airplane-transasia-idUSKBN0L80RK20150204
傾一世等一人
會不會是先停運，然後等員工受不了自己離職，因為合併就必須安排員工在新公司的職位，等到差不多沒那麼多人了，復興再接受威航的飛機，又不會有抗議的聲音，多麼美好的銜接啊！
我覺得應該還是會資遣，因為公司本身如果業務量縮減，又沒合適職缺的話本來就可依法資遣。而且年資最多才兩年。新制遣散費真的很少⋯⋯服務一年只需要付半個月遣散費，所以最多發一個月遣散費，而且空勤人員其實底薪很低，遣散費說不定只有2-3萬而已⋯⋯我記得威航應該沒地勤人員，應該就空勤跟行政。
總覺得復興留威航有故事...等人買？留品牌？航權？包機？租來租去好弄帳？
我覺得應該還是會資遣，因為公司本身如果業務量縮減，又沒合適職缺的話本來就可依法資遣。而且年資最多才兩年。新制遣散費真的很少⋯⋯服務一年只需要付半個月遣散費，所以最多發一個月遣散費，而且空勤人員其實底薪很低，遣散費說不定只有2-3萬而已⋯⋯我記得威航應該沒地勤人員，應該就空勤跟行政。
總覺得復興留威航有故事...等人買？留品牌？航權？包機？租來租去好弄帳？
回憶綿長
總覺得復興留威航有故事...等人買？留品牌？航權？包機？租來租去好弄帳？
留那二架.A320. 有沒有辦法變二機的航空公司而生存.
找買家?分配新航權? 包機服務? 出租機?
留那二架.A320. 有沒有辦法變二機的航空公司而生存.
找買家?分配新航權? 包機服務? 出租機?
東京的櫻花落滿巴黎的街頭
留那二架.A320. 有沒有辦法變二機的航空公司而生存.
找買家?分配新航權? 包機服務? 出租機?
威航剛開始起家時,也只有靠一架A321打天下,2架320應該也沒辦法飛太多航線吧
該不會復興想要切割威航品牌連同航權一併打包出售?
找買家?分配新航權? 包機服務? 出租機?
威航剛開始起家時,也只有靠一架A321打天下,2架320應該也沒辦法飛太多航線吧
該不會復興想要切割威航品牌連同航權一併打包出售?